Sunday, 18 November 2012


Let’s Talk About Plot

By: Steven Tutino

“...in lieu of plot you may find that you have a sort of temporary destination, perhaps a scene that you envision as the climax. So you write toward this scene, but when you get there, or close, you see that because of all you’ve learned about your characters along the way, it no longer works.”
                                                                                                                          Ann Lamott Bird by Bird

            Whenever, it comes to writing, plot has always been my one true weakness.  I rather think that detail is quite easy to achieve, like in a painting or a sketch; the nose or the eyes, the eyelashes, and the red lips are something any one can do with minor difficulty. Rather, the most important thing is to first complete the painting or work of art and then focus on the peculiarities. I think a good well developed story that consists of not too much detail has more success than a story that has plenty of detail, but the plot is not as effective and clear.
            In elementary school, whenever I(my classmates) had creative writing classes and we were discussing effective strategies in order to write a story, our instructor  told to draw a spider; the body with all its eight stick legs with large circles at the end of them. We could have used multiple spiders, some strictly for characters or just for plot.  I always looked forward to creative writing with great enthusiasm, yet and up to this day, whenever I start to write my piece, a pure and simple mess occurs! I remember writing a story about a couple of friends and myself on some kind of quest and as soon as I began to read it out loud, I realized my story made absolutely no sense, the characters were everywhere, some disappeared, while some new ones magically appeared. Of course, I think my skills as a writer have improved since then but the way I go about developing my plot has not changed one bit. I usually have this very strong idea and then I base my entire story around that plot/idea, the beginning to the end, which my mind is always able to conjure up without thinking things through. I think it comes down to a general problem that my plot carries the characters and the entire story, rather than the other way around. For example, I like the idea of suicide endings and I base my entire story on how everything will culminate and lead up to that. Then, once in the stage of writing my story I realize that the connection between the ending and the characters I have put on the page is implausible.  
            In plot, and I know I am probably repeating what other writers have insisted on for the past thousands of years, desires and goals are crucial. If your story is about some girl for instance, who seems to walk through life as though she were a zombie or in a dream, perhaps she is being controlled by forces she cannot comprehend such as her unconscious. But you as the writer must provide us with clues, hints, obstacles she encounters that begin to give us a sense of what her conflict consists of.

            Always write down your ideas! Please! Unless you have another method that is beneficial to how you go about writing, you should always carry a portable notebook and writing utensil around you.  Ever since I have been a student in a creative writing class, I have written almost if not all of my ideas down, and although I now realize that those ideas and pieces of dialogue will not serve as utile in my current endeavours, I am simply content with the fact that I expressed myself on paper and threw up all that junk lying in my system. I am someone who reflects and thinks about a lot of different scenarios and dialogue. I tell myself that I will remember to write them down, then I got to work and halfway during my shift, I will have forgotten everything; only a vague distorted glimmer of light remains in the far back of my mind.  Neither will I throw out any of those writings because they can serve as a guide to embark on another creative project.

           While I think that plot and character are inseparable, I also believe in compromise, in the sense that if I want to make that suicide the ultimate moment in my piece, then I might have to change something about the characters or the entire story itself and re-start from scratch. On the other hand, if I truly feel within my body and soul that my characters are staying with me on this one, then I would scrape out the plot, hands down. I think this latter point of view is more effective because if the climax or denouement you have created does not fit in or make logical sense with the progression and characterisation of your characters, then it will simply not be believable. I would rather preserve and help bring to life those characters that I created, that I conjured up, in times of sadness, stress and despair, which are a foil for my inner turmoil, my personality and my take on the world. I am currently in the midst of writing a major project for my creative writing class and I recently came to the realization that all those notes, writings and ideas for an ending just do not make sense, simply because I was too stubborn to admit to myself that the characterizations and motifs do not one hundred percent match up to my desired ending. They are incompatible. Now I have decided to erase the plot and my ending while still preserving the same sense of conflicts found within my previous characters.  Novelist John Gardner describes the purpose off not just plot but fiction as“...creating a dream in the reader’s mind. We may observe, first, that if the effect of the dream is to be powerful, the dream must probably be vivid and continuous-vivid because if we are not clear about what it is that we’re dreaming, who and where the characters are, what it is that they’re doing or trying to do and why, our emotions and judgement must be confused, dissipated, or blocked; and continuous because a repeatedly interrupted flow of action must necessarily have less force than action directly carried through from its beginning to its conclusion.” This I think is something to be cherished and preserved as one of the true marks of being an authentic effective writer. I believe we writers simply know and feel when we have accomplished the ‘dream’ in our works. The reward is simply priceless.

            My big point: always make your characters guide and create your story. I think we have to embody the role of a parent in relation to our characters. They are like our children, innocent, learning something new along the way, encountering obstacles, and yet it is our job as a parent/guardian to simply hold their hand along the way, even though we have no clue where they are taking us.  Once your character achieves what he wants or your story is about to reach its end, I do think that something totally out of the blues can occur, but your entire story, from the beginning should build up to that crucial scene, when everything is about to come to an end; when she tells him that their relationship will not work out, where the protagonist leaves with knowledge that no one else possesses, yet with some little ember of dignity and respect hiding beneath that veil of darkness.
            I believe many struggling writers like myself are like little embers trapped and lost in darkness, but with the potential to grow and radiate through the dark into a fiery burning sun in order to create some of the best plots and pieces of writing the world has ever seen. We just have to avoid the sprinklers!   

           

The Clarity of Writing


The Clarity of Writing
By: Ariane Arsenault

“Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell. ” - Strunk & White

An issue that often arises with writing is the message that is portrayed by the reader. Writers want the readers to understand what they are specifically writing about, which can end up becoming troublesome if not taken over by the reigns. A writer is often seen as a carrier with a message, painting a certain idea to his or her audience. The message or idea can be difficult to show to the reader if it is not made clear enough for all to understand. A few tips of mine to stop this confusion are the following: waiting to edit for a certain amount of time, reading out loud, and picking out a person, any person, and thinking as if you were them.

The flow of writing can be difficult to obtain yet is possible. If you see any mistakes that you don't understand, your reader will probably not understand them either. It is important to go over every sentence of your work and determine if they belong in the text or not. Choosing whether something is relevant or not is a dilemma that all writers must go through. Editing does help, but taking time off after having written helps even more. After editing your work, take a few hours or days off the constant headache of trying to make everything sound comprehensible. This will help you think of your text in a different way. When going back to the text, some issues may appear clearer because of the small break.

Sometimes, it can be easy to miss out on some unclear parts of your work when they are only re-read. Reading out loud is a great tactic to single out any mistakes that were seemingly invisible when read over. Don't worry about anyone overhearing, simply dive into the words and look out for any problematic sentences. Reading your own work out loud will also give you an idea of how your work is displayed and may give you a different perception on what you had written before. Hearing how your sentences are structured may seem different from the usual editing process but it is definitely a strategy that should be done to embellish your work and determine whether some parts need more clarity to them.

Trying to grab a person's point of view and getting inside their head is obviously something that seems impossible, although it is relatively easy. Take, for instance, taking the bus. There are many potential people who you can try and grasp their points of view towards your work. What would that old lady with a blue shawl think of your story? Would she tell you to edit the part where you speak of a flower garden because it does not seem clear enough? It is obvious that it is absurd to know exactly what the person is actually thinking, but getting into their character does wonders to become critical of your work. Try to think what they are thinking, why are they wearing those specific clothes, what their profession is, and mostly, what would they think of your draft? The point is to try to make your work understandable and relevant to a wide audience, to everyone in the end.

These tips work for every type of writing project, they even worked for this blog article. Happy writing!

Milking the Space Cow, or How to Get Thay Perfect Idea


Milking the Space Cow, or How to Get That Perfect Idea
By Victoria Quercia


                I imagine if you’re reading this, you’re doing it for either of two reasons. One, you have written about a page and a half of your latest short story, poem, play or whatever, and you’re suddenly drawing a blank because you have no idea what comes next. The other possibility is that you saw the title and thought to yourself “Hmm, space cows…”

                Well, it doesn’t matter what possessed you to take a peek at this article, because now that you’ve started reading this – whether you’re having trouble coming up with fresh ideas or not – that title alone has provided you with such an unusual (and potentially disturbing) mental image that you won’t be able to forget about this blog post until you’ve satisfied your curiosity by reading it and have determined that the author is not using hallucinogenic drugs.

                So, now that I’ve ensured you’re hooked, let’s get down to business.

                You might have noticed that sometimes you start a story and things are going pretty great. You’ve established your setting, you’ve put your characters into the setting, and maybe you’ve even thought up a snappy title for the finished product. But, then you get to that part where things are supposed to start happening and you’re suddenly drawing a blank. The well has run dry. There’s no gas left in the tank. If you can think of another crappy cliché about running out of ideas, let me know.

                In short, you just can’t come up with anything that works. All that pops into your head are things that you keep telling yourself are absolutely stupid and ridiculous and make no sense at all. Now, if you’re standing up and can manage to tear your eyes away from the computer screen for a few seconds, you should probably go find yourself a chair and take a seat before you read on. What I’m about to tell you might be a little difficult to process. Seated yet? Good.

                You need to open up your word processor – or get out your typewriter if you’re really old school – you need to get out your unfinished work, and you need to continue writing your story by using all the stupid, whacky, ridiculous and nonsensical ideas that pop into your head. Yes, that’s right. All that stuff you keep insisting has no place in your work of beauty needs to be thrown into it. All of it. Killer amoebas from outer space? Write it. Demon-possessed ferrets? Write it. People who speak by oinking at each other? Okay, that one’s a little far-fetched, but write it, anyway!

                Before you ask, no I am not telling you this because I’m hoping eliminate the competition. I am telling you this because those absolutely stupid ideas aren’t going to go anywhere until you write them down. If you’ve got a pile of useless clutter in your basement that is constantly in your way, it won’t be out of your way until you throw it out. And sometimes, when you go through that useless clutter, you might even find something that isn’t completely useless after all (dibs on the killer amoebas).

                And, let’s be honest, unless you’re one of the old school writers mentioned above, if it turns out that all the useless junk in your head really is useless junk, then you can just hold down the backspace button until it all goes away, and, finally, you can forget all about it and move on.

                So, the next time you sit down to write that un-writeable something, do what comes naturally. Not everything you write is going to be serious and poignant, and most of it probably doesn’t need to be. If you’ve emptied your head and you still can’t come up with something then just close up shop and take a nap. Or something like that. Who knows? Maybe the great space cow will deliver while you’re sleeping.

Blue Curtains by Isabel Plaa


When my brother has a question about English he always asks me. It could have something to do with the Literature program I’m in, or maybe he just doesn't like how my other two sisters explain things. One night he asked me "Does the author always put so many symbols intentionally? Cause my teacher finds symbolic details in dirt. It’s bullshit.” Like my brother, most of us have probably been there. The most famous example of this is "Why are the curtains blue? Because the author wanted to emphasize the character’s sadness, loneliness blah blah blah." We all secretly think; maybe he or she just liked blue curtains. If our class was lucky, maybe there was a student who’d say this out loud and get the death glare from the teacher clutching To Kill A Mockingbird to her chest.
When it comes to our own writing, we start thinking that every little detail must be symbolic. It doesn't. Most of the time, if you really begin to write your work with emotion and passion, symbolic details will just pop up on their own. This year I wrote a short story about a girl lying in a field of grass and a boy with a crush on her sits down too because he wants to learn how to understand her. My friend pointed out that a meadow is a really intimate place and it's ironic how they both are there but he feels distant from her. Although it's not a huge symbol, it's a little one and I had no intention of ever having it. I used a field because, frankly, they sound cool. Another example a friend found in my work was when the girl gave the boy an origami bird and when he goes home he realizes it fell out of a hole in his pocket. She said something along the lines that “the ending was interesting because the bird is suppose to symbolize freedom but he loses it so it shows he can’t hold onto her or his future.” When someone is peer editing my work, like in both of these examples, I just nod like that was my intention. It wasn’t and it doesn’t have to be yours either.
My point of this little spiel is don’t write with symbols in mind. From experience, I learnt that it makes my writing forced and not fluid. The best types of symbols are the ones you don’t intend, the ones you find with your readers. Yes, you can intend to put a few symbols into your writing because it might help foreshadow or explain your story line. But don’t go thinking you must be a writer like Margret Atwood or Edgar Allen Poe (who are amazing writers if you haven’t come across their work) who have symbols every few lines. Be your own writer. Make your own symbols—or don’t. The beauty of writing is that there are no rules. Write a piece with so many symbols it’s the best piece to write an essay on or don’t and create a piece with absolutely no symbols to see what your writing on it’s own can come up with.
So when my brother asked me that question, I answered; “Of course not but just go with it.” 

Ellen Hopkins verse novels


 Ever since high school, I have read Ellen Hopkins's verse books. Her stories are all about the struggle of an individual. family and friends when drugs are introduced into their lives. Her first book, Crank and some of her other books are based on her own experience with her daughter who was influenced by meth and other narcotics.
The books themselves are written in verse style: a type of narrative poetry where the novel is told using poetry instead of paragraph. Ellen's  writing is rather complex in which she manages to use lines break to form new sentences within the text itself. Each page is a different style of poem but it carries the story further and further. Her most quoted exert from her first book introduces her style in a way that the reader has to read the page over twice to experience both the sentences in the one:

FLIRTING WITH THE MONSTER
LIFE WAS GOOD
BEFORE I 
MET 
THE MONSTER.
AFTER,
LIFE
WAS GREAT.
AT 
LEAST 
FOR A LITTLE WHILE.

Her style is difficult to get into at first but after reading two or three pages the reader is hypnotized by this unique style and shocking content that they can't but the book down until they have finished.

Ellen's an author that exaggerates an issue to create shock value and to a certain extent scare the reader senseless giving them resistance to drug experimentation. Some would say she does this for readers but in my opinion, she does this because she has gone through this story (to a certain extent) and knows that despite all the campaigns and speeches, kids will still experiment with drugs and it can easily get out of hand. Writing with so much exaggeration might very well be what saves a kids life after reading this.

Her poetic style is a great format for teens because of the small amount of writing on the pages but large amount of pages, the reader will feel like they have accomplished a huge book and gives them confidence to read more books with more pages. Not to mention that the poetic style is somewhat like a puzzle; trying to read all the sentences in one sentence is the challenge Hopkins has given her readers.

Her rap sheet of books includes the following with a summary of their content.

ALL OF HER BOOKS ARE WRITTEN IN FREE VERSE

CRANK: Her first novel based on her daughters struggle with meth. Written in the POV of her daughter (name has been changed of course).

BURNED: The story of a young girl who is abused by her father and is sent to live in Nevada with her aunt. She falls in love and experiences sex for the first time and finds out the root of her fathers abuse.

PULSE: The books follows three young kids in a psych hospital all struggling suicide.

IDENTICAL: Named the most intense of the books, Identical follows the lives of twin girls. One of the sisters is sexually abused by their father and not even her twin sister will believe her.

GLASS: The sequel to Hopkins daughter's story Crank in which she continues her story.

TRICKS: Is the stories of five different adolescents who fall into prostitution for different reasons.

FALLOUT: The latest story based around Hopkins daughter, tells the story of her children she abandoned all around the country and how they are dealing with the mysteries of their mother and the struggles of their lives knowing about the result of drug addiction.

PERFECT: This story is relatable to most kids, especially girls who are dealing with the struggles of being "perfect" and desired by friends and crushes.

TILTED: Her latest book, is about the struggles a child faces when their parents separate and their lost of trust with themselves and others.

All of Hopkins' books have some strand of relatability each child can experience in their young lives. Her style of writing is what appeals to that age and the content itself is captivating.






Tips for Francophone writing in English By: MJ Cromp

Are you writing in another language? This is a video for Francophone who are writing in English. It might help the Anglo too!

Enjoy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBvSyCCCbaI


Saturday, 17 November 2012

Problems With Outlining and Brainstorming

Problems With Outlining and Brainstorming
by Alina Stecko


The writing process is different for every writer, we all have our own tactics. Some writers when they come up with an idea can just write their story without any outlining while others when an idea hits must write every single detail down.

Maybe it’s just me but I see outlining and brainstorming as two different techniques. When I think of outlining I think about planning out the story line  character profiles, and figuring out what’s going to happen between the beginning and the end. Whereas brainstorming is like the minor tiny details that make up a story.

On a personal note I've tried writing a story that I outlined and brainstormed the whole thing. I knew how it was going to start, what was going to happen in the middle and how it was eventually going to end as well as random details about the character’s life.  For some reason this story was never finished. It sits in a folder on my laptop completely covered in cobwebs and dust with all the information I had gathered for it before beginning to write it. This was two years ago and I still can’t seem to figure out what went wrong.  It’s confusing because I know that if I were to sit down in front of a blank screen with a vague story idea in my head with no outline I wouldn't be able to write that story either.

When asked whether she outlined her first novel ‘Die For Me’ young adult writer Amy Plum said that “I did not outline Die For Me. In fact, I didn't even know what I was going to write until I sat down in the morning in front of my keyboard. I felt that was the more “honest” way of telling a completely made-up story like that of the revenants. However...it also prevented me from sleeping. For a whole summer. Which I would definitely count as a drawback.” She did note that for her second and third novels that she did have to plan them out a bit more because it was a trilogy and so they had to have a constant flow between the three books, but that it was very vague outlining. She explains that “I plan what is going to happen, but don’t know exactly how it will take place or where. That’s part of the fun for me is sitting down and thinking, “Okay. These characters need to have this conversation now. What would be the best place for it to happen?’”

On another personal note like Amy Plum I have also tried just to loosely outline a story and that failed as well and not just once but twice. It seems for some reason that I have much better luck finishing short stories. It could be because maybe I think about it too much since I find that if I revisit a story a few months later then I can write a bit more of it before the same problem happens again. I think I need to find my balance of just the right amount of outlining and brainstorming and then I’ll be able to finish things without a problem.

What it comes down to I think is that every writer will eventually get their story down onto paper but the way they go about getting it there will be entirely up to them.